I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is 50 bullets. But I really need to locate a bullet in the a hundred and sixty course that my more mature rifle likes.
I have utilized H4831 (and H4831SC), and I use it. There aren't numerous cartridges which i use it for as I seem constantly to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't declare that it isn't going to work. It is just that Another powders do the job far better to get a supplied cartridge. As an example, inside the 280, H4831 gave me superior velocity and very fantastic teams with Nosler 140 AB. Nonetheless, RL19 was marginally far better in precision, nevertheless the velocity was almost equivalent.
You're accurate They are really exactly the same the SC is brief cut so it meters far better, I don't Feel you may get just common 4831 anymore
Minnesota H4831SC is my check out within the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the tiny I have still left for slide 2021. I would get started low and do the job your way up, based on what load data you examine for this combo the min/max loads are all around the board.
Novice to reloading. This is going to be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable of get my hands on a pair lbs of h4831.
It is really very likely that no additional dialogue is needed, wherein circumstance we advocate commencing a fresh thread. If on the other hand you really feel your reaction is necessary it is possible to nonetheless do so.
I am utilizing it that has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as correct. RL22 did properly but I used to be slightly worried h4831 vs h4831sc about temp stability. I believe I am at seventy two grains and have about 2850ish fps
Like stated higher than, similar stuff. All of that differs is the size on the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they are going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I do not know if which is legitimate or not but would make sense to me. I take advantage of SC for the reason that which is what I present in the 8 lb jug and it works.
Using the smoother circulation attributes h4831sc arrives far more uniform cost weights, although the individual grains orient much more compactly, generating greater loading density.
locutus mentioned: I nevertheless have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows by my powder actions easily.
I've experienced identical encounter with H4350. h4831 vs h4831sc For me, some ball powders will not shoot effectively with anything at all besides Fed215's. Some components just Do not play well with other. Looks like you've got preferred three superior powders, I might assume at the least one of them to shoot.
The "SC" stands for Short Minimize. I have not noticed a distinction between possibly powder dut I do not Consider I'd mix them.
I commonly constantly receive the sc version. Utilizing a powder evaluate it hangs up considerably less as a result of shorter kernels and I think allows far more steady metering so less time you're taking trickling in the final bit of cost to help make bodyweight. So mainly the SC saves you moments
The fact that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is exactly why you might be observing higher velocities received with that powder, as opposed to That which you've observed with the IMR stuff.